<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darwin = Hitler!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2009/11/darwin-hitler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2009/11/darwin-hitler/</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2009/11/darwin-hitler/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=545#comment-985</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Reinhard Heydrich used the Darwinian term “natural selection” to explain why he felt the Holocaust was necessary. Wannsee, January 20, 1942. Heydrich said that those Jews who survived the forced labor program would eventually breed a race of stronger Jews would could pose a threat. (Apostate Jews in the 1910s and 1920s had supplied a large quotient of the brain power for the German and Russian communist movements. Heydrich, as a Darwinian, believed that the entire Jewish “race” was a matrix for communism. This is nonsense, of course — many Jews were German patriots and Heydrich himself was a quarter Jewish –but this is cited as a actual reason to turn a useful forced labor program into an extermination program. Natural selection. Ever heard of it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Despite a lot of words your entire comment doesn&#039;t even respond to a single thing I&#039;ve said.

Eugenics, much like &#039;pure-bred&#039; dog breeding, usually produces specialized and brittle freaks, unable to cope with the slings and arrows of nature. Humans selection of humans isn&#039;t nature&#039;s selection, despite your claims to the contrary. Nor do you respond to the fact that eugenics was within one species, and that this breeding within this species was an very old idea indeed.

This blog post is about evaluating whether the new ideas proposed in Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection provided the scientific basis for the Nazi eugenics programme. When you speak nonsense like &quot;The Holocaust was explicitly Darwwinian (sic)&quot; you throw a lot of mud but fail to provide any evidence.

We can see whether his scientific work was necessary or comparable to Nazi eugenics by looking at the text. If you think the text of OoS or any other works makes theories and predictions that were used by Nazis then produce them. 

Darwin’s theories have as much to do with nazi eugenics as Copernican theories have to do with ballistic missiles. They&#039;re in similar fields of science, but that&#039;s it. Nothing Darwin advanced was necessary to eugenics, and nothing in it was used in Nazi eugenics.

I suggest in the future that you first read and understand the blog posts you respond to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Reinhard Heydrich used the Darwinian term “natural selection” to explain why he felt the Holocaust was necessary. Wannsee, January 20, 1942. Heydrich said that those Jews who survived the forced labor program would eventually breed a race of stronger Jews would could pose a threat. (Apostate Jews in the 1910s and 1920s had supplied a large quotient of the brain power for the German and Russian communist movements. Heydrich, as a Darwinian, believed that the entire Jewish “race” was a matrix for communism. This is nonsense, of course — many Jews were German patriots and Heydrich himself was a quarter Jewish –but this is cited as a actual reason to turn a useful forced labor program into an extermination program. Natural selection. Ever heard of it?</p></blockquote>
<p>Despite a lot of words your entire comment doesn&#8217;t even respond to a single thing I&#8217;ve said.</p>
<p>Eugenics, much like &#8216;pure-bred&#8217; dog breeding, usually produces specialized and brittle freaks, unable to cope with the slings and arrows of nature. Humans selection of humans isn&#8217;t nature&#8217;s selection, despite your claims to the contrary. Nor do you respond to the fact that eugenics was within one species, and that this breeding within this species was an very old idea indeed.</p>
<p>This blog post is about evaluating whether the new ideas proposed in Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection provided the scientific basis for the Nazi eugenics programme. When you speak nonsense like &#8220;The Holocaust was explicitly Darwwinian (sic)&#8221; you throw a lot of mud but fail to provide any evidence.</p>
<p>We can see whether his scientific work was necessary or comparable to Nazi eugenics by looking at the text. If you think the text of OoS or any other works makes theories and predictions that were used by Nazis then produce them. </p>
<p>Darwin’s theories have as much to do with nazi eugenics as Copernican theories have to do with ballistic missiles. They&#8217;re in similar fields of science, but that&#8217;s it. Nothing Darwin advanced was necessary to eugenics, and nothing in it was used in Nazi eugenics.</p>
<p>I suggest in the future that you first read and understand the blog posts you respond to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koster</title>
		<link>http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2009/11/darwin-hitler/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=545#comment-982</guid>
		<description>Reinhard Heydrich used the Darwinian term &quot;natural selection&quot; to explain why he felt the Holocaust was necessary. Wannsee, January 20, 1942. Heydrich said that those Jews who survived the forced labor program would eventually breed a race of stronger Jews would could pose a threat. (Apostate Jews in the 1910s and 1920s had supplied a large quotient of the brain power for the German and Russian communist movements. Heydrich, as a Darwinian, believed that the entire Jewish &quot;race&quot; was a matrix for communism. This is nonsense, of course -- many Jews were German patriots and Heydrich himself was a quarter Jewish --but this is cited as a actual reason to turn a useful forced labor program into an extermination program. Natural selection. Ever heard of it?

NB – Hitler also believed himself to be a quarter Jewish — this has never been either proven or refuted. The worst hatred is self-hatred. Hitler was a neo-pagan rather than a Christian, cited Darwinian princples in “Mein Kampf” and elsewhere and approved “Neo-Darwinism” as the basis of a eugenics program that starved retarded Aryans, sterilized Aryans with low IQs, and was later expanded to exterminate all Jews except for decorated or crippled war veterans or those who were over 65 and unlikely to breed. The Holocaust was explicitly Darwwinian.

Last Tag — We all know Hitler was cracked, and the fact that he considered himself as greater than Jesus is not an evidence of Christianity but of mental ilness. Consult any expert on abnormal psychology and ask whom people with delusions of grandeur claim to be….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reinhard Heydrich used the Darwinian term &#8220;natural selection&#8221; to explain why he felt the Holocaust was necessary. Wannsee, January 20, 1942. Heydrich said that those Jews who survived the forced labor program would eventually breed a race of stronger Jews would could pose a threat. (Apostate Jews in the 1910s and 1920s had supplied a large quotient of the brain power for the German and Russian communist movements. Heydrich, as a Darwinian, believed that the entire Jewish &#8220;race&#8221; was a matrix for communism. This is nonsense, of course &#8212; many Jews were German patriots and Heydrich himself was a quarter Jewish &#8211;but this is cited as a actual reason to turn a useful forced labor program into an extermination program. Natural selection. Ever heard of it?</p>
<p>NB – Hitler also believed himself to be a quarter Jewish — this has never been either proven or refuted. The worst hatred is self-hatred. Hitler was a neo-pagan rather than a Christian, cited Darwinian princples in “Mein Kampf” and elsewhere and approved “Neo-Darwinism” as the basis of a eugenics program that starved retarded Aryans, sterilized Aryans with low IQs, and was later expanded to exterminate all Jews except for decorated or crippled war veterans or those who were over 65 and unlikely to breed. The Holocaust was explicitly Darwwinian.</p>
<p>Last Tag — We all know Hitler was cracked, and the fact that he considered himself as greater than Jesus is not an evidence of Christianity but of mental ilness. Consult any expert on abnormal psychology and ask whom people with delusions of grandeur claim to be….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

