Comments on: The ISO Standardisation of OOXML in 17 Easy Steps http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/ Blog Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:36:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Family Holloway » Blog Archive » Where’s OpenDocument 1.2? (ODF) http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-861 Family Holloway » Blog Archive » Where’s OpenDocument 1.2? (ODF) Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:54:04 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-861 [...] the OOXML mess it was said that ODF 1.2 would be released in late 2007 but as that date grew closer people [...] [...] the OOXML mess it was said that ODF 1.2 would be released in late 2007 but as that date grew closer people [...]

]]> By: Family Holloway » Blog Archive » OpenDocument support in Microsoft Office SP2 (ODF) http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-389 Family Holloway » Blog Archive » OpenDocument support in Microsoft Office SP2 (ODF) Fri, 08 May 2009 02:08:59 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-389 [...] obvious question raised during the ISO OOXML process is around an equivalent to Egovt Web Standards for Office Documents. The existing scheme of [...] [...] obvious question raised during the ISO OOXML process is around an equivalent to Egovt Web Standards for Office Documents. The existing scheme of [...]

]]> By: Family Holloway » Blog Archive » First release of PilferPage http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Family Holloway » Blog Archive » First release of PilferPage Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:20:37 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-20 [...] I hadn’t gotten distracted I would have released this software a year [...] [...] I hadn’t gotten distracted I would have released this software a year [...]

]]> By: SimBioSys Blog » Blog Archive » What is wrong with OOXML http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-14 SimBioSys Blog » Blog Archive » What is wrong with OOXML Sun, 11 May 2008 20:04:45 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-14 [...] as a standard via blatant manipulation, ballot stuffing, corruption in various levels, see some of the history here and here. More irregularities: Poland’s new rule: no vote equals yes, Cuba’s No vote [...] [...] as a standard via blatant manipulation, ballot stuffing, corruption in various levels, see some of the history here and here. More irregularities: Poland’s new rule: no vote equals yes, Cuba’s No vote [...]

]]> By: admin http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-13 admin Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:41:38 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-13 Thanks, fixed. Thanks, fixed.

]]> By: Blacz http://holloway.co.nz/blog/2008/03/the-iso-standardisation-of-ooxml-in-17-easy-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Blacz Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:01:38 +0000 http://holloway.co.nz/blog/?p=10#comment-15 The "process irregularities" link is malformed, it links to: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080327231223154 The “process irregularities” link is malformed, it links to:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080327231223154

]]>